Cathy Zhang <cathy.h.zh...@huawei.com> wrote:
Hi Ihar and all,
Yes, we have been preparing for such a release. We will do one more round
of testing to make sure everything works fine, and then I will submit the
release request.
There is a new patch on "stadium: adopt openstack/releases in subproject
release process" which is not Merged yet.
Shall I follow this
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/neutron/stadium/sub_project_guidelines.html#sub-project-release-process
to submit the request?
Do you have a good bug example for Neutron sub-project release request?
For the time being, until the patch landds, you may follow any of those
directions.
An example of a release request bug is:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/networking-bagpipe/+bug/1589502
BTW, a functional and tempest patch for networking-sfc has been uploaded
and it might take some time for the team to complete the review. The test
is non-voting. Do you think we should wait until this patch is merged or
release can be done without it?
It would be great to have CI voting, but then, you already lag with the
release for months comparing to release date of Neutron Mitaka, and you
risk getting into Phase II support mode before you even release the first
version. If you don’t envision release blocker bugs in the branch, I would
suggest you release the thing and then follow up with bug fixes for
whatever you catch later on. In a way, it’s better to release a half baked
release than to not release at all. That’s to follow the ‘release often’
mantra, and boost adoption.
Thanks,
Cathy
-----Original Message-----
From: Ihar Hrachyshka [mailto:ihrac...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 1:24 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SFC stable/mitaka version
Tony Breeds <t...@bakeyournoodle.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 12:40:48PM +0000, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone looking at creating a stable/mitaka version? What if
someone want to use this for stable/mitaka?
If that's a thing you need it's a matter of Armando asking the release
managers to create it.
I only suggest Armando is not dragged into it, the release liaison
(currently me) should be able to handle the request if it comes from the
core team for the subproject.
Ihar
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
