On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 01:39:55AM +0000, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > So I guess what I'm asking: If stable branches exist as a place for > package maintainers to collaborate on a common set of backported > fixes, and are not actually usable to that end, why do we continue > to provide them?
I don't this has a binary answer. It's a scale. The branches we have do have value but they just don't last long enough to cover the '5 year support contract' use case, but I think we're basically on the same page there. If we could support release for longer, we would. Yours Tony.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
