Hi all, As follow up on the mailing list discussion [0], gerrit activity [1][2] and cinder 3rd party CI policy [3] I'd like to initiate discussion how Cinder follows, or rather does not follow, the standard deprecation policy [4] as the project has been tagged on the assert page [5].
I'm not here to argue about the justification or rightfulness of the Cinder policy regarding the drivers with 3rd party CI. (quite frankly I think the Cinder policy makes lots of sense and thus propose the removal of the tag rather than change of that policy) Just stating the obvious that the Cinder policy does not comply with the follows-standard-deprecation and thus the tag should be removed from Cinder. Best, Erno (jokke) Kuvaja [0] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-August/100717.html [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/348032/ [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/348042/ [3] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers [4] https://governance.openstack.org/reference/tags/assert_follows-standard-deprecation.html#requirements [5] https://governance.openstack.org/reference/tags/assert_follows-standard-deprecation.html#application-to-current-projects __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
