> On 30 Aug 2016, at 12:42, Paul Bourke <paul.bou...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Do people feel we still want to require a bug-id in the commit message for > features, when reno notes are present? My understanding is that till now > we've required people to add bugs for non trivial features in order to track > them as part of releases. Does/should reno supersede this?
I think it makes sense to keep the bug/blueprint id because some of our features are distributed in several reviews and only one of the reviews includes the release note. When removing the bug/blueprint ids from the commit message when a reno note will be added with one of the reviews it will be difficult to track the relations. Christian.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
