On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 9:17 PM, Hongbin Lu <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ivan,
>
> Thanks for the proposal. From Magnum's point of view, this proposal
> doesn't seem to require to store neutron/rabbitmq credentials in tenant VMs
> which is more desirable. I am looking forward to the PoC.
>

Hogbin, Can you please elaborate on this will not require to store neutron
credentials?
For example in libnetwork case, neutron's commands like "show_port" and
"update_port" will still need to be invoked from inside VM.

Overall I liked this approach given its simplicity over vlan-aware-vms.

-VikasC

>
> Best regards,
> Hongbin
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Coughlan, Ivan <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> *Overview*
>>
>> Kuryr proposes to address the issues of double encapsulation and exposure
>> of containers as neutron entities when containers are running within VMs.
>>
>> As an alternative to the vlan-aware-vms and use of ovs within the VM, we
>> propose to:
>>
>> -          Use allowed-address-pairs configuration for the VM neutron
>> port
>>
>> -          Use IPVLAN for wiring the Containers within VM
>>
>>
>>
>> In this way:
>>
>> -          Achieve efficient data path to container within VM
>>
>> -          Better leverage OpenStack EPA(Enhanced Platform Awareness)
>> features to accelerate the data path (more details below)
>>
>> -          Mitigate the risk of vlan-aware-vms not making neutron in time
>>
>> -          Provide a solution that works on existing and previous
>> openstack releases
>>
>>
>>
>> This work should be done in a way permitting the user to optionally
>> select this feature.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Required Changes*
>>
>> The four main changes we have identified in the current kuryr codebase
>> are as follows:
>>
>> ·         Introduce an option of enabling “IPVLAN in VM” use case. This
>> can be achieved by using a config file option or possibly passing a command
>> line argument. The IPVLAN master interface must also be identified.
>>
>> ·         If using “IPVLAN in VM” use case, Kuryr should no longer
>> create a new port in Neutron or the associated VEth pairs. Instead, Kuryr
>> will create a new IPVLAN slave interface on top of the VM’s master
>> interface and pass this slave interface to the Container netns.
>>
>> ·         If using “IPVLAN in VM” use case, the VM’s port ID needs to be
>> identified so we can associate the additional IPVLAN addresses with the
>> port. This can be achieved by querying Neutron’s show-port function and
>> passing the VMs IP address.
>>
>> ·         If using “IPVLAN in VM” use case, Kuryr should associate the
>> additional IPVLAN addresses with the VMs port. This can be achieved using
>> Neutron’s allowed-address-pairs flag in the port-update function. We
>> intend to make use of Kuryr’s existing IPAM functionality to request these
>> IPs from Neutron.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Asks*
>>
>> We wish to discuss the pros and cons.
>>
>> For example, containers exposure as proper neutron entities and the
>> utility of neutron’s allowed-address-pairs is not yet well understood.
>>
>>
>>
>> We also wish to understand if this approach is acceptable for kuryr?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *EPA*
>>
>> The Enhanced Platform Awareness initiative is a continuous program to
>> enable fine-tuning of the platform for virtualized network functions.
>>
>> This is done by exposing the processor and platform capabilities through
>> the management and orchestration layers.
>>
>> When a virtual network function is instantiated by an Enhanced Platform
>> Awareness enabled orchestrator, the application requirements can be more
>> efficiently matched with the platform capabilities.
>>
>> http://itpeernetwork.intel.com/openstack-kilo-release-is-sha
>> ping-up-to-be-a-milestone-for-enhanced-platform-awareness/
>>
>> https://networkbuilders.intel.com/docs/OpenStack_EPA.pdf
>>
>> https://www.brighttalk.com/webcast/12229/181563/epa-features
>> -in-openstack-kilo
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ivan….
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> Intel Research and Development Ireland Limited
>> Registered in Ireland
>> Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare
>> Registered Number: 308263
>>
>> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the
>> sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others
>> is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
>> contact the sender and delete all copies.
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> ______________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscrib
>> e
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to