Thanks James for this quick and clear answer! Neil
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 8:46 PM, James Page <james.p...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > Hi Neil > > On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 at 20:43 Neil Jerram <n...@tigera.io> wrote: > >> Should it be possible to run two OpenStack charm units, that both use >> haproxy to load balance their APIs, on the same machine? Or is there some >> doc somewhere that says that a case like that should use separate machines? >> >> (I'm asking in connection with the bug report at >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-charm-testing/+bug/1622697.) >> > > No - that's not currently possible. For example, if you try to place both > nova-cloud-controller and cinder units on the same machine, they both > assume sole control over haproxy.cfg and will happily trample each others > changes. > > There is a doc somewhere - I'll dig it out and add to the charm-guide on > docs.openstack.org. > > Solution: use a LXC or LXD container for each service, assuring sole > control of the filesystem for each charm, avoiding said conflict. > > Cheers > > James > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev