On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:16 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) <std...@cisco.com> wrote: > One note in this poll. Repo-split has already reached a consensus decision > via ml vote, and the activity around that will happen prior to summit, so it > is probably worth ignoring entirely. > > Regards > -steve > > > On 9/21/16, 10:14 AM, "Michał Jastrzębski" <inc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > Now, when we have full list of sessions, let's prioritize them > accordingly to our preferences. Based on this we'll allocate our > summit space. > > > http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/vote.pl?id=E_8368e1e74f8a0049&akey=91bbcf4baeff0a2f > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
I agree. We already devoted a couple of sessions (or more) in Austin design summit and couple of polls on ML thread. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
