Thanks for all guys. So we have reached an agreement now. We will mark the fedora deprecated now ( Newton ), and plan to drop it in O cycle.
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Haïkel <hgue...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > 2016-09-21 16:34 GMT+02:00 Steven Dake (stdake) <std...@cisco.com>: > > > > > > > > On 9/20/16, 11:18 AM, "Haïkel" <hgue...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > > 2016-09-19 19:40 GMT+02:00 Jeffrey Zhang <zhang.lei....@gmail.com>: > > > Kolla core reviewer team, > > > > > > Kolla supports multiple Linux distros now, including > > > > > > * Ubuntu > > > * CentOS > > > * RHEL > > > * Fedora > > > * Debian > > > * OracleLinux > > > > > > But only Ubuntu, CentOS, and OracleLinux are widely used and we > have > > > robust gate to ensure the quality. > > > > > > For fedora, Kolla hasn't any test for it and nobody reports any bug > > > about it( i.e. nobody use fedora as base distro image). We (kolla > > > team) also do not have enough resources to support so many Linux > > > distros. I prefer to deprecate fedora support now. This is talked > in > > > past but inconclusive[0]. > > > > > > Please vote: > > > > > > 1. Kolla needs support fedora( if so, we need some guys to set up > the > > > gate and fix all the issues ASAP in O cycle) > > > 2. Kolla should deprecate fedora support > > > > > > [0] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016- > June/098526.html > > > > > > > > > /me has no voting rights > > > > As RDO maintainer and Fedora developer, I support option 2. as it'd > be > > very time-consuming to maintain Fedora support.. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > Jeffrey Zhang > > > Blog: http://xcodest.me > > > > > > > Haikel, > > > > Quck Q – are you saying maintaining fedora in kolla is time consuming or > that maintaining rdo for fedora is time consuming (and something that is > being dropped)? > > > > Both, in my experience in maintaining RDO on Fedora, I encountered > similar issues than Kolla. It's doable but a lot of work. > One of the biggest problem are updates, you may have disruptive > updates on python modules packages quite frequently, or even rarer, > get some updates reverted. > So keeping Fedora in a good shape would require a decent amount of efforts. > > Regards, > H. > > > > > Thanks for improving clarity on this situation. > > > > Regards > > -steve > > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > ______________ > > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject: > unsubscribe > > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > ______________ > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject: > unsubscribe > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > ______________ > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject: > unsubscribe > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Regards, Jeffrey Zhang Blog: http://xcodest.me
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev