I think with PKI tokens we had worse to worry about!

At any rate, would be great to know, and if there isn't a strong reason
against it we can make project name 255 for some more flexibility.

Plus although there is no true official standard, most projects in
OpenStack seem to use 255 as the default for a lot of string fields.
Weirdly enough, a lot of projects seem to use 255 even for project.id,
which seeing as it's 64 in keystone, and a uuid4 anyway, seems like a
bit of a waste.


On 29/09/16 16:19, Steve Martinelli wrote:
> We may have to ask Adam or Dolph, or pull out the history textbook for
> this one. I imagine that trying to not bloat the token was definitely
> a concern. IIRC User name was 64 also, but we had to increase to 255
> because we're not in control of name that comes from external sources
> (like LDAP).
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:06 PM, Adrian Turjak
> <adri...@catalyst.net.nz <mailto:adri...@catalyst.net.nz>> wrote:
>
>     Hello Keystone Devs,
>
>     Just curious as to the choice to have the project name be only 64
>     characters:
>     
> https://github.com/openstack/keystone/blob/master/keystone/resource/backends/sql.py#L241
>     
> <https://github.com/openstack/keystone/blob/master/keystone/resource/backends/sql.py#L241>
>
>     Seems short, and an odd choice when the user.name
>     <http://user.name> field is 255 characters:
>     
> https://github.com/openstack/keystone/blob/master/keystone/identity/backends/sql_model.py#L216
>     
> <https://github.com/openstack/keystone/blob/master/keystone/identity/backends/sql_model.py#L216>
>
>     Is there a good reason for it only being 64 characters, or is this
>     just
>     something that was done a long time ago and no one thought about it?
>
>     Not hugely important, just seemed odd and may prove limiting for
>     something I'm playing with.
>
>     Cheers,
>     Adrian Turjak
>
>
>     __________________________________________________________________________
>     OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>     Unsubscribe:
>     openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>     <http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>     <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to