2016-09-26 16:05 GMT+02:00 Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info>: > On 16-09-26 07:48 AM, Haïkel wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> following our discussions about 3rd party gates in RPM packaging project, >> I suggest that we vote in order to promote the following gates as voting: >> - MOS CI >> - SUSE CI >> >> After promotion, all patchsets submitted will have to validate these gates >> in order to get merged. And gates maintainers should ensure that the gates >> are running properly. >> >> Please vote before (and/or during) our thursday meeting. >> >> >> +1 to promote both MOS and SUSE CI as voting gates. >> >> Regards, >> H. > > > I'm not sure what you mean by voting gates. Gates don't vote, an individual > job can leave a verified +1 in the check queue or/and a verified +2 in the > gate queue. > > Third party CI systems do not vote verified +2 in gerrit. They may if the > project chooses vote verified +1 on a project. >
Yeah, that was pretty much what was assumed. Gates that do not leave verified +1 are called non-voting, so logically gates that leaves verified +1 are called voting gates. > If you need clarification in what third party ci systems may do in gerrit, > you are welcome to reply to this email, join the #openstack-infra channel or > participate in a third party meeting: > http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Third_Party_Meeting > > Thank you, > Anita. > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
