hi, as there are many candidates this TC election, i figured i'd ask a question to better understand the candidates from the usual sales pitch in self-nominations. hopefully, this will give some insights into the candidates for those who haven't voted yet. obviously, the following is completely optional. :)
i initially asked this to John Dickinson[1] in his self-nomination. i'd like to open this up to everyone. the (re-worded) question is: the TC has historically been a reactive council that lets others ask for change and acts as the final approver. do you believe the TC should be a proactive committee that initiates change and if yes, to what scope? more generally, what are some specific issues you'd like the TC address in the coming year? [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-September/104821.html thanks, -- gord __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
