On 10/10/16, 11:31 AM, "Erno Kuvaja" <ekuv...@redhat.com> wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Andrey Pavlov <andrey...@gmail.com> >wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I want to backport this bug - >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance-store/+bug/1616556 >> but review for master is stuck since August - >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/357827/ >> > >My stand on backporting this as I commented to the bug as well: >"""By the looks of it this really isn't a bug but a feature request >and as such we should not backport it.""" > >Thanks, >Erno The patch for master needs a bit of work. After that's completed, we can discuss a backport. I'm inclined to agree with Erno, but am open to other opinions. It would help your case to enlist the opinion of the cinder driver maintainer. cheers, brian > >> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Ian Cordasco <sigmaviru...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Ian Cordasco <sigmaviru...@gmail.com> >>> Reply: Ian Cordasco <sigmaviru...@gmail.com> >>> Date: October 7, 2016 at 08:47:19 >>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> >>> Subject: [Glance] [stable] Bug backports >>> >>> > Hi Glancers! >>> > >>> > After the news that we all released Newton yesterday, it's time to >>>start >>> > thinking about >>> > backports the future of our Mitaka and Liberty branches. >>> > >>> > I expect that Mitaka will start to enter Phase II [1] and Liberty's >>> > end-of-life is right >>> > around the corner [2] (2016-11-17). If there are bugs that are >>>affecting >>> > those branches >>> > that need to be backported before their status changes, they should >>>be >>> > proposed immediately >>> > and brought up at the Glance team meeting [3]. >>> > >>> > [1]: >>>http://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html >>> > [2]: https://releases.openstack.org/ >>> > [3]: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Glance_Team_Meeting >>> >>> >>> In case you missed it, Friday the 14th (October 2016) the stable team >>> is moving Mitaka to Phase II and Liberty to Phase III [1]. >>> >>> Please respond to this message with bugs and backport reviews that >>> should land prior to Mitaka entering Phase II. >>> >>> [1]: >>> >>>http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-October/105302.h >>>tml >>> >>> Cheers, >>> -- >>> Ian Cordasco >>> >>> >>>________________________________________________________________________ >>>__ >>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>> Unsubscribe: >>>openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Kind regards, >> Andrey Pavlov. >> >> >>_________________________________________________________________________ >>_ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: >>openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > >__________________________________________________________________________ >OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev