On 2016-11-03 15:03:44 -0400 (-0400), Chuck Short wrote: > I was looking at packaging monasca-statsd since it is a dependency for > designate, however when I look at the license for it,it says Apache-2. > However the LICENSE file included in the source is that the software is > provided as is...etc etc. Could we get some clarification please?
It looks like https://review.openstack.org/123315 added that LICENSE file when originally setting up the monasca-statsd repo a couple years ago. I see a variety of Datadog repositories in circulation using that license, and they seem to refer to it as "a simplified BSD license" (which is certainly what it looks like to me as well). However, all the individual files added in that change which declare a license in their headers seem to use Apache License 2.0, which I agree is confusing. Hopefully the Datadog license was added here in error, and we've not actually been shipping an incorrectly-licensed derivative of their software this entire time? -- Jeremy Stanley
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
