On Mon, 07 Nov 2016 15:53:51 -0800 Joshua Harlow <harlo...@fastmail.com> wrote:
> Standards though exist for a reason (and ini files are pretty common > across languages and such); though of course oslo.config has some very > tight integration with openstack, the underlying ini concept it > eventually reads/writes really isn't that special (so hopefully such a > thing existing isn't that hard). Swift in Go demonstrated that it's not the ini format that's the problem for reimplementation, the paste-deploy is. In particular, the names from pipeline= define section names, and egg names define what code is executed. So one can have "pipeline=keystone app", but [keystone] section is actually use=egg:swift#tempauth, not Keystone. It's pefectly legal and will work today, even if such a configuration is a hostile move against future coworkers. -- Pete __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
