> On 16 Nov 2016, at 15:12, Matt Riedemann <mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > On 11/16/2016 7:53 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ian Cordasco <sigmaviru...@gmail.com> >> Reply: Ian Cordasco <sigmaviru...@gmail.com> >> Date: November 16, 2016 at 07:06:27 >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Stable] Usefulness of Weekly Meeting >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Tony Breeds >>> Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) , >>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>> Date: November 15, 2016 at 16:55:36 >>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Stable] Usefulness of Weekly Meeting >>> >>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:25:26AM -0800, Ian Cordasco wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> So the stable-maintenance team (and liaisons to it) have had a meeting >>>>> scheduled for a while now. Recently, however, we've had trouble >>>>> getting more than one person to attend meetings when we have them. >>>> >>>> I need to apologise for letting this happen. >>> >>> I'd like to emphasize that I don't see this as any one person's fault. I >>> just was thinking >>> aloud about whether or not we find much use. We're not exactly a high >>> activity team and >>> we do communicate very well via this very medium. >>> >>>> The current arrangement with 2 >>>> meetings US/EU and US/AU means that I can only attend the US/AU timeslot, >>>> and I >>>> failed to set someone to run the US/EU meeting. I'd like to propose that we >>>> switch the arrantment to: >>>> >>>> US/AU: #openstack-meeting-4 2100 UTC Monday (same time as now different >>>> room) >>>> AU/EU: #openstack-meeting-4 1000 UTC Monday >>> >>> This sounds fine to me. It might even be less confusing than having two >>> separate days and >>> channels too. >>> >>>> Alternate weeks, although we *could* run both meetings on the same day >>>> every >>>> 2nd week if people wanted. >>>> >>>>> I wonder if it would be more useful to less frequent meetings (perhaps >>>>> every other week) and if we need to reschedule them to better serve >>>>> those who plan to attend. >>>> >>>> As always it's a question of less often is harder to form a habit. I'd >>>> like to >>>> request we try the new schedule until the PTG and then re-evaluate. >>> >>> That sounds fine with me. I just wanted to gather some other feedback. :) >> >> I submitted https://review.openstack.org/398363 so that folks can see how >> this translates to their calendar using the generated ics files. >> >> Cheers! >> -- >> Ian Cordasco >> >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > FWIW I'm fine with doing fewer meetings or just shifting the meetings to a > time that is more accommodating for Tony. As noted, we do a pretty good job > already of communicating via the mailing list when we need to. The stable > team meetings have never been well attended even when I was running them > regularly.
+1. I also don’t feel like there is a lot of daily work for the team that would require weekly sync in IRC. We use mailing lists effectively enough. We are no longer broken on a daily basis because of all the safety measures applied. I feel like an email or async irc discussion with others is good enough for my level of involvement. Ihar __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
