On 2016-12-02 11:35:05 +0100 (+0100), Thierry Carrez wrote: [...] > So I'm now wondering how much that artificial scarcity policy is hurting > us more than it helps us. I'm still convinced it's very valuable to have > a number of "meetings rooms" that you can lurk in and be available for > pings, without having to join hundreds of channels where meetings might > happen. But I'm not sure anymore that maintaining an artificial scarcity > is helpful in limiting conflicts, and I can definitely see that it > pushes some meetings away from the meeting channels, defeating their > main purpose. [...]
As someone who frequently gets pinged in random teams' meetings as well as attending many regularly over the course of a week, I find having them spread out as much as possible to be helpful to me, at least. If everyone pings me at the same time because they're all holding meetings in conflicting timeslots in many channels, I'll probably just have to start scheduling "office hours" instead and telling people to arrange any in-meeting input from me well in advance. -- Jeremy Stanley __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
