On Wed, 2016-12-07 at 06:50 -0800, Michael Johnson wrote: > Lubosz, > > I would word that very differently. We are not dropping LBaaSv2 > support. It is not going away. I don't want there to be confusion > on > this point. > > We are however, moving/merging the API from neutron into Octavia. > So, during this work the code will be transitioning repositories and > you will need to carefully synchronize and/or manage the changes in > both places. > Currently the API changes have patchsets up in the Octavia > repository. > However, the old namespace driver has not yet been migrated over. I know I've talked about using the namespace driver as a guinea pig for the nlbaas to octavia shim driver layer, but I didn't know it would be fully supported in octavia. This will require a bit more work because of the callbacks the agent expects to be able to call.
> > Michael > > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Kosnik, Lubosz <lubosz.kosnik@intel.c > om> wrote: > > Hello Zhi, > > So currently we’re working on dropping LBasSv2 support. > > Octavia is a big-tent project providing lbass in OpenStack and > > after merging > > LBasS v2 API in Octavia we will deprecate that project and in next > > 2 > > releases we’re planning to completely wipe out that code > > repository. If you > > would like to help with LBasS in OpenStack you’re more than welcome > > to start > > working with us on Octavia. > > > > Cheers, > > Lubosz Kosnik > > Cloud Software Engineer OSIC > > > > On Dec 6, 2016, at 6:04 AM, Gary Kotton <gkot...@vmware.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > I think that there is a move to Octavia. I suggest reaching out to > > that > > community and see how these changes can be added. Sounds like a > > nice > > addition > > Thanks > > Gary > > > > From: zhi <changzhi1...@gmail.com> > > Reply-To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > Date: Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 11:06 AM > > To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] New extensions for > > HAProxy driver > > based LBaaSv2 > > > > Hi, all > > > > I am considering add some new extensions for HAProxy driver based > > Neutron > > LBaaSv2. > > > > Extension 1, multi subprocesses supported. By following this > > document[1], I > > think we can let our HAProxy based LBaaSv2 support this feature. By > > adding > > this feature, we can enhance loadbalancers performance. > > > > Extension 2, http keep-alive supported. By following this > > document[2], we > > can make our loadbalancers more effective. > > > > > > Any comments are welcome! > > > > Thanks > > Zhi Chang > > > > > > [1]: http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/1.6/configuration.html#c > > pu-map > > [2]: > > http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/1.6/configuration.html#option > > %20http-keep-alive > > ___________________________________________________________________ > > _______ > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsu > > bscribe > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________________ > > _______ > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsu > > bscribe > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > _____________________________________________________________________ > _____ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubs > cribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev