On 12 December 2016 at 14:55, Andreas Jaeger <a...@suse.com> wrote: > > So, what are the steps forward here? Requiring a non-free library like > drbdmanage is not acceptable AFAIU, >
This is pretty much where things went dead at the summit - there were various degrees of unacceptability (I was personally bothered by the the parts that can't be freely redistributed, rather than free software per se, but that still leaves a large number of problem cases. Few people were willing to seriously consider pulling 1/3 of the cinder drivers out, and there was not AFAICT a firm conclusion. -- Duncan Thomas
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
