On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) <std...@cisco.com> wrote: > Folks, > > > > I am in favor of using a new tag called [rdo] such that RDO (or its > transitive dependencies) can be discussed and filtered by email clients as > it relates to development topics that affect the broader OpenStack > ecosystem. As RDO is a community driven project which is very much related > to OpenStack, I think sharing a little bit of OpenStack list bandwidth isn’t > too much to ask. > > > > Further I’d invite the broader Kolla team to subscribe to the rdo-list, > which is a much more comprehensive coverage of RDO (both users and devs with > significant traffic) and filter rdo-list as you prefer: > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list > > > > Thanks! > > -steve > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
Hi Steven, I'm not sure I understand the intention fully here. openstack-dev is super gluttered already as it is, can you give an example what would be appropriate discussion in openstack-dev [rdo] rather than having that discussion on rdo-project mailing list? My initial thought is that I'd very much would not like to open the openstack-dev to any 3rd party projects (yes I'm fully aware that rdo is very much related to OpenStack and my employer, it does not make it any less 3rd party to OS development) to discuss their matters. So my initial reaction would be "Please no". - Erno 'jokke' Kuvaja __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
