Hi Jay && Matt, Thanks for your valuable help~ I will continue to work on this now for 3rd CI
Best Regards, Kevin Zhao On 21 December 2016 at 10:34, Matt Riedemann <mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On 12/20/2016 7:27 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > >> On 12/20/2016 12:45 AM, Kevin Zhao wrote: >> >>> Hello Nova, >>> Greetings from ARM and Linaro :D >>> This is Kevin Zhao from ARM. Nowadays Linaro and other >>> contributors have submitted some patches to Nova community , fixing bugs >>> for Nova running on AArch64. Now we can successfully running a OpenStack >>> cluster on AArch64 and pass much of the tempest test. The >>> virtuallization hypervisor is based on Libvirt+KVM. >>> >>> Actually in Barcelona Keynote(interoperability Challenge >>> <https://www.openstack.org/videos/video/openstack-interopera >>> bility-challenge-running-unmodified-apps-in-any-openstack-cloud>, >>> >>> at 10:30') one of the OpenStack interoperability cloud is from Linaro, >>> all based on AArch64 machines. >>> I see there is a Nova support matrix >>> <http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/support-matrix.html>. So my >>> question is : >>> * what do we need to do, so that Nova can official support AArch64 >>> architecture? for example add AArch64 to this support matrix?* >>> >>> Sincerely thanks for your help. Any of your response will be >>> really appreciated. >>> >> >> Hi Kevin, >> >> I think the first thing you would need to do is set up some sort of >> continuous integration system that can be notified by upstream patch >> changes/pushes and report results of Tempest testing against a build of >> OpenStack on AArch64 machines. >> >> You can read about setting up third-party CI for this here: >> >> http://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/ >> >> Best, >> -jay >> >> ____________________________________________________________ >> ______________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscrib >> e >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > Yeah as Jay said it's probably 3rd party CI to recognize it in the support > matrix. > > -- > > Thanks, > > Matt Riedemann > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev