On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 9:22 PM, Tony Breeds <t...@bakeyournoodle.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 01:31:42PM -0500, Ian Cordasco wrote: > >> I believe you asked in another thread (that I cannot locate) if it was >> acceptable to the Glance team to not have an 11.0.3 tarball on >> openstack.org. With Brian on vacation, I'm hoping the other stable >> maintenance cores will chime in. I, for one, (as Release CPL and a >> Stable branch core reviewer) don't think the tarballs are critical for >> Glance. I'm fairly certain that most of the deployment projects use >> the Git repository directly or Distro provided packages (which are >> built from git tags). With that in mind, I don't think this should >> block Glance being EOL'd. > > Sounds good. We can always generate and manually upload signed tarballs and > wheels, we can't do it with our automated tools. > > I'll include glance projects in the next round of EOL requests to infra. > >> I'm sorry for the delay in my reply. I took a little over a week of >> time off myself. > > No problem. It's that time of year. > > Yours Tony. > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
++ I think this is reasonable way forward. Thanks for your efforts! - jokke __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev