Greetings OpenStack community,

Our first meeting for 2017 opened with a bang. Lots of people in attendance to 
talk about the ongoing adventure of trying to improve the handling of the 
concept of visibility in Glance. If we had had more time we could have 
continued talking about it for a long time. We touched on issues of backwards 
compatibility in the face of semantic confusion, microversions, the value and 
strength of guidelines, and the impact of API changes on users. The current 
blocking issue is described at 
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-ocata-community-images-api-stability . 
We mostly agreed that the long term satisfaction of all users, existing and 
future, trumps anything else. Further discussion will continue on the review 
mentioned in the etherpad: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/412731/

We also had some pretty strenuous discussion about the pagination review at 
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/390973/ but ran out of time before getting 
into any true discussion of the capabilities review 
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/386555/ .

All of this suggests we've got some useful work to look forward to.

# Newly Published Guidelines

Nothing new

# API Guidelines Proposed for Freeze

Guidelines that are ready for wider review by the whole community.

None at the moment, but you are always very welcome to review stuff in the next 
section.

# Guidelines Currently Under Review [3]

* Add guidelines on usage of state vs. status
  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/411528/

* Add guidelines for boolean names
  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/411529/

* Clarify the status values in versions
  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/411849/

* Define pagination guidelines
  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/390973/

* Add API capabilities discovery guideline
  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/386555/

# Highlighting your API impacting issues

If you seek further review and insight from the API WG, please address your concerns in 
an email to the OpenStack developer mailing list[1] with the tag "[api]" in the 
subject. In your email, you should include any relevant reviews, links, and comments to 
help guide the discussion of the specific challenge you are faciing.

To learn more about the API WG mission and the work we do, see OpenStack API 
Working Group [2].

Thanks for reading and see you next week!

# References

[1] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[2] http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/api-wg/
[3] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/api-wg,n,z

Meeting Agenda
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/API-WG#Agenda
Past Meeting Records
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/api_wg/
Open Bugs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-api-wg

--
Chris Dent                 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯           https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent                                         tw: @anticdent
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to