On 11/01/17 08:06 AM, William M Edmonds wrote: > > After discussing with my team, I think we will need to propose a revert. > The deprecation process was not followed correctly here. We will start > working on moving to panko, but we are not sure we can contain that for > Ocata. Please follow the deprecation process correctly in future and we > can avoid this hassle for everyone.
the above is not correct. prior to you sending this email, i had already made an effort to revert the patch because i chose to look at the ceilometer+panko integration and saw a gap i'd like tested first. i encourage you to do this next time rather than sending: 'i didn't try it but...'. understandably you have limited resources and i believe no one understands this more than the Telemetry team. regards, -- gord __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
