On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 02:11:42PM -0500, James Slagle wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com> > > wrote: > >> Greetings, > >> > >> With the containerization[1] of tripleo, I'd like to know more about the > >> future of > >> diskimage-builder as it relates to the tripleo project. > >> > >> Reading the recently approved spec for containers, container (image) > >> builds are > >> no longer under the control of tripleo; by kolla. Where does this leave > >> diskimage-builder as a project under tripleo? I specifically ask, because > >> I'm > >> wanting to start down the path of using diskimage-builder as an interface > >> to > >> containers. > >> > >> Basically, is it time to move diskimage-builder out from the tripleo > >> project > >> into another, or its own? Or is tripleo wanting to more forward on > >> development > >> efforts on diskimage-builder. > > > > Looking at stats on who is actively contributing into DIB: > > http://stackalytics.com/?module=diskimage-builder > > > > It seems that we have some folks from infra and some folks on dib > > only, and a few contributors from TripleO. > > > > I guess the best option is to ask DIB contributors: do you want to own > > the project you're committing to? > > If not, is it something that should stay in TripleO (imo no) or move > > into openstack-infra (imo yes, if infra agrees). > > > > With my PTL hat, I'm really open to this thing and I wouldn't mind to > > transfer ownership to another group. > > I was under the impression it was already it's own project team based on: > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-July/099805.html > > It looks like the change was never made in governance however. > Yes, it just looks like Greg created new core reviewers, not officially breaking away from tripleo.
If everybody is on board with moving diskimage-builder outside of tripleo, we need to decided where it lives. Two options come to mind: 1) Move diskimage-builder into own (big tent?) project. Setup a new PTL, etc. 2) Move diskimage-builder into openstack-infra (fungi PTL). 3) Keep diskimage-builder under tripleo (EmilienM PTL). Thoughts? > The reason I -1'd Paul's TripleO spec and suggested it be proposed to > diskimage-builder was due to: > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-June/098560.html and > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/336109/ > > I just want to make sure the right set of reviewers who are driving > dib development see the spec proposal. > > -- > -- James Slagle > -- > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
