On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Fox, Kevin M <kevin....@pnnl.gov> wrote:
> As for operators, If the more common projects all started depending on it, > it would be commonly deployed. Would the operators deploy Barbican just for > Magnum? maybe not. maybe so. For Magnum, Ironic, and Sahara, more likely . > Would they deploy it if Neutron and Keystone depended on it, yeah. they > would. And then all the other projects would benefit from it being there, > such as Magnum. Agree. The problem is, was one project created just for being used together with other OpenStack projects or it could be used perfectly in standalone mode? There are a lot of projects nowadays in OpenStack besides the several most important ones (Nova, Cinder, Neutron, Keystone, Glance, etc.). Most new projects will say they can be used separately without necessarily in OpenStack deployment, the question is, what are the advantages of the project over the existing solutions? If the operators could get more benefit by deploying and maintaining a new service than using a pre-existing one? >From my perspective (maybe I'm wrong), many projects are struggling in OpenStack world, and at the same time, they are not that competitive with solutions outside OpenStack world. Just my $0.0000002 Cheers, Lingxian Kong (Larry)
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev