On 24/01/17 02:05 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > I'm ok if you deprecate it in Ocata, as long: > > 1) it's properly document how to make a transition to the new services. > 2) We don't remove it in Pike, because work to deprecate it would have > been done end of Ocata. > > Deal?
no. period. (triple period?) . . . tbh, i don't care about configurable control exchanges since it's already there, just not obvious unless you've hacking that specific part of code. also, the collector work doesn't seem to be moving so i was just trying to force it anyways. i would prefer to see to the polling definition work merged since it's something we've been talking about for over a year now and it still keeps old functionality but really it's more again to clear design up a bit as everyone seems to think the pipeline is relevant to polling agents when that has not been case for a while. long story short: you win, congrats. cheers, -- gord __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
