On 07/02/2014 12:25 PM, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: > On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> wrote: >> I'd like to look at this in terms of the end goal, translations. That is >> the end goal, yes? >> >> Is one tool any better than the other (zanta and pootle are the two >> options, yes?) at doing translating? Is the end product substantially >> better using one tool than the other? > > Right, Zanata and Pootle are the two leading options. The translations > team seemed to prefer Zanata so we said we'd work to get a demo going > for them so they could try it themselves, just like we have for > Pootle. > > On our end maintainability is the major consideration, since we don't > want to deploy a solution that will be disruptive to translators > (during upgrades, etc) or insecure. > Can we get an item on next week's infra agenda and have some of the folks doing the translation work attend and offer their opinion?
It seems we might be at a point of weighing costs of setup and maintenance time versus advantages of use. Thanks, Anita. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
