On 20 November 2014 13:43, Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/19/2014 07:32 PM, Michael Krotscheck wrote: >> >> Jay- >> >> My own UX tests have demonstrated a need for both page jumping, and >> being able to communicate to a user where they are in their list. I'd be >> happy to show you the videos if you have a few hours. > > > I don't have a few hours, no. :) But, what use case does jumping to page 7 > of some results listing fulfill?
For one, remembering where you were and coming back to it (more or less). Jumping by batch index is cheap compared to the proposed clone-the-result-set-ids thing, and IME useful enough that I'd be annoyed at a system without it. @Michael - I suggest just using a simple stable batch marker - e.g. the unique key of the edge of the batch - which is stable enough to handle inserts and deletes without double-showing or skipping rows. -Rob -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
