I agree with John (comment on the mentioned patchset). Also, I expected one change removing all drivers that does not report on CI. There's one of us (HUSDriver) that is not maintained and also should be deprecated/removed.
Liu, the best argument here would be a report from your CI in this patch saying it fails. On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:13 PM, liuxinguo <liuxin...@huawei.com> wrote: > Hi Mike, > > > > I have seen the patch at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165990/ saying > that huawei driver will be removed because “the maintainer does not have a > CI reporting to ensure their driver integration is successful”. > > > > But in fact we really have a CI months ago and it is really reporting to > reviews, the most resently posts are: > > > > *https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165796/ > > Post time: 2015-3-19 0:14:56 > > > > *https://review.openstack.org/#/c/164697/ > > Post time: 2015-3-18 23:55:37 > > > > *https://review.openstack.org/164702/ > > Post time: 2015-3-18 23:55:37 > > > > *https://review.openstack.org/#/c/152401/ > > Post time: 3-18 23:08:45 > > > > And if you want, I will give you more proof of reviews. > > > > Thanks and regards, > > Liu > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
