On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 10:01:06AM -0700, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: >> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Spencer Krum <n...@spencerkrum.com> wrote: >> > I think this is a good conversation to have. I would recommend we start >> > a thread-per-conference for simplicity. Folks can use this to coordinate >> > attendance, ensure we submit unique presentations, and to help each >> > other groom presentations. I doubt that anyone on the team would feel >> > any offense at someone else submitting on infra topics, but coordination >> > sounds good. Whenever we are presenting on an infra topic, being clear >> > to put credit for building and supporting the technology in the correct >> > place is something we should be careful to do. >> > >> > We've always used the publications repo to archive an collaborate on >> > talks, but I think our use of that isn't quite correct at this time. >> >> Yeah, we don't tend to prepare the presentations until after our talks >> have been accepted and that's when we use the publications repo. >> >> I like using the mailing list as a notification mechanism but I think >> we should also maintain an etherpad with a listing so we can keep it >> all organized in the longer term. >> > I'd be happy to see a etherpad URL we can use to list conferences and talks > people are thinking of talking at.
Your wish... https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/infra-conferences-2016 -- Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2 _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
