On 05/03/2016 09:45 PM, James E. Blair wrote:
Andreas Jaeger <[email protected]> writes:
Goals:
1. bindep-fallback.txt should be minimal and handle packages that the
majority of projects need.
Isn't the goal to remove bindep-fallback.txt completely?
I wasn't sure whether we want to go that far - but that's also why I
stated the goals so that we can all be on the same page ;).
I hope so -- I think it should be -- otherwise we are saying projects
should explicitly declare their binary dependencies, except for some
arbitrary set.
I understand we may iterate a bit before we get there, and 'minimal' can
be a step on the way to 'removed'.
Yes, this would be the first step in this direction. But if we want to
remove it, the messaging around it will be different ;)
Thanks for the write up!
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
