Fridays work for me too. Regards, Thanh
On 5 July 2016 at 14:03, Darragh Bailey <daragh.bai...@gmail.com> wrote: > It's starting to sound like Friday would suit people best, I'm happy > enough with that day as well, may have to leave slightly before 17hr utc, > but should be able to be present for most of the time. > > Darragh Bailey > "Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool" - unknown > On 5 Jul 2016 17:21, "Wayne Warren" <wa...@puppet.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 6:32 AM, Darragh Bailey <daragh.bai...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 5 July 2016 at 05:44, Kien Ha <kienha9...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> HI Darragh, >>>> >>>> I would like to help where I can in the reviews, but Tuesdays and >>>> Thursdays are my busiest days. I can only guarantee that I am free after >>>> 19:00 UTC on Tuesdays and Thursdays. Monday and Fridays are days where I am >>>> free from summer class obligations but I am not too sure if that will work >>>> with everyone else. >>>> >>> >>> I can do Monday, assuming Friday is a little more awkward for people in >>> European timezones as they plan to wrap up for the day earlier. >>> >>> Woud 13:00-1700 UTC suit on those days? >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Kien Ha >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Dong Ma <winterma.d...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hey Darragh, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I agree with your thought and would like to participate to the >>>>> reviews, although the time slots is a little late for me but it works. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> Would moving the time slot an hour earlier on either Mon/Fri suit you >>> better? >>> >> >> For the proposed time slots so far, Friday would be better for me--I have >> a team meeting I cannot miss between UTC 1530 and UTC 1630 (although it >> usually runs a half hour short). >> >> However, if Monday 1300 - 1700 UTC ends up being the best time for >> everyone else, I can attempt to split my attention between the JJB 2.0 >> review session and that meeting, or set aside dedicated time outside of the >> review session to respond to comments and iterate on the 2.0 patches >> (really I will want to do this anyway). >> >> >>> -- >>> Darragh Bailey >>> "Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool" >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list >>> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra >>> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra