On Wed, Aug 24, 2016, at 09:37 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > As discussed in yesterday's team meeting[1], it's time to start > thinking ahead to our Ocata design summit sessions. I've created a > planning pad[2] with some information on the format and constraints. > > Consensus seems to be that we tend to get more out of workrooms than > fishbowls, so if we're going to request fewer of one than we had at > the Newton summit I think it should be fishbowls. To that end, I've > put us down for one fishbowl and five workrooms this time, but could > be convinced to shift that balance to two fishbowls and four > workrooms if the early ideas list favor fishbowl format more than > they have in previous cycles (we still have a week to adjust our > official allocation request). > > [1] > http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2016/infra.2016-08-23-19.01.html > [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/infra-ocata-summit-planning > [3]
Another thing that might be nice is getting at least one group of workroom time slots adjacent to each other so that we have a "long" session if we need it. Not sure if the scheduling will make that possible though. Clark _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
