sounds a good time for me as well.. TY > On Nov 2, 2016, at 11:55, Ricardo Carrillo Cruz > <ricardo.carrillo.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Works for me. > > Thanks > > 2016-11-02 19:46 GMT+01:00 David Shrewsbury <shrewsbury.d...@gmail.com > <mailto:shrewsbury.d...@gmail.com>>: > Mon 20:00 UTC is fine with me. > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 1:30 PM, James E. Blair <cor...@inaugust.com > <mailto:cor...@inaugust.com>> wrote: > Hi, > > Recently, a bunch of folks have expressed an interest in helping with > Zuul v3. With more than a handful of people engaged in active > development, it seems like it might be time to adopt some useful > development practices. One of those is scheduling a weekly meeting, the > other is task tracking. > > The meeting would be a time and place for everyone engaged in Zuul > development to discuss what they are doing with everyone else, get into > as much detail as is needed, and help us ensure we're making the > progress we want to. > > Of course, we will still use the #zuul channel to talk about things as > they come up. And we will still participate in the Infrastructure > meeting as needed to coordinate with the wider team. > > As our team includes people in the Middle East, Europe, North America, > and Oceania, I propose that we schedule the meeting for Monday at 20:00 > UTC. (19:00 would be a good alternative if 20:00 is bad for folks. > Straying too far from that tends to make things more difficult for folks > on either end of our timezone spectrum.) > > Clint Byrum (SpamapS) has volunteered to help organize the tasks needed > to make progress and encode them into Storyboard. This will be a bit of > a work-in-progress for a short while as we work on articulating what's > needed to grow from a few developers to many more, but at the end of the > process both Storyboard and our meeting should serve to provide a > clearer picture of what needs to be done and a fluid mechanism for > accomplishing it. > > Please let me know if the proposed time (Monday, 20:00 UTC) works for > you, or if an alternate time would be better. > > Thanks, > > Jim > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org > <mailto:OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra> > > > > -- > David Shrewsbury (Shrews) > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org > <mailto:OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra> > > > !DSPAM:1,581a36e9225882973722590! > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > > > !DSPAM:1,581a36e9225882973722590!
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra