Blair Bethwaite wrote: > On 10 Nov 2016 8:56 PM, "Thierry Carrez" <thie...@openstack.org > <mailto:thie...@openstack.org>> wrote: >> >> The issue with this solution is that any "monthly" slot ends up being >> exactly the same as a "weekly" slot: you can't schedule any >> weekly/biweekly meetings at the same time and location. Monthly meetings >> are therefore paradoxically more wasteful than biweekly meetings, and >> there is therefore little point in adding them to the software since you >> can emulate them with "weekly" bookings and just skip most meetings. > > That seems to be based on the assumption that other groups wouldn't want > monthly scheduling? > > Also, I'd suggest we avoid "monthly" altogether and instead use > "4weekly", that would seem to allow biweekly meetings to use the same > day&time on the alternate (odd/even) week.
4weekly sounds like a good idea! Less conflicts ftw. If we really really want monthly stuff, we could create a channel dedicated to monthly meetings, to avoid creating conflicts on every channels. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
