On 02/20/2018 02:23 AM, Paul Belanger wrote:
Why not just split the builder configuration file? I don't see a need to add code to do this.
I'm happy with this; I was just coming at it from an angle of not splitting the config file, but KISS :)
I did submit support homing diskimage builds to specific builder[2] a while back, which is more inline with what ianw is asking. This allows us to assign images to builders, if set.
[2] https://review.openstack.org/461239/
Only comment on this is that I think it might be better to avoid putting specific hostnames in there directly; but rather add meta-data to diskimage configurations describing the features they need on the builder, and have the builder then only choose those builds it knows it can do. Feels more natural for the message-queue/scale-out type environment where we can add/drop hosts at will. We've two real examples to inform design; needing the Xenial build host when all the others were trusty, and now the arm64 based ones. -i _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
