Cool trick. :) I think I got it all but please do double-check: https://review.openstack.org/121426
The upstream this will pull from is https://github.com/annegentle/ha-guide Thanks, Anne On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Andreas Jaeger <a...@suse.com> wrote: > On 09/14/2014 09:25 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > On 09/14/2014 08:16 PM, Anne Gentle wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Edgar Magana <edgar.mag...@workday.com > >> <mailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com>> wrote: > >> > >> Can you guys include me in any further discussions? > >> I want to help.. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Edgar > >> > >> From: Adam Lawson <alaw...@aqorn.com <mailto:alaw...@aqorn.com>> > >> Date: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 at 11:48 AM > >> To: Anne Gentle <a...@openstack.org <mailto:a...@openstack.org>> > >> Cc: David Medberry <david.medbe...@canonical.com > >> <mailto:david.medbe...@canonical.com>>, Sriram Subramanian > >> <sri...@sriramhere.com <mailto:sri...@sriramhere.com>>, > >> "openstack-d...@lists.openstack.org > >> <mailto:openstack-d...@lists.openstack.org>" > >> <openstack-d...@lists.openstack.org > >> <mailto:openstack-d...@lists.openstack.org>>, > >> "openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org > >> <mailto:openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>" > >> <openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org > >> <mailto:openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>> > >> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] High Availability Guide team > >> > >> I'd be happy to participate as needed Anne. > >> > >> On Aug 26, 2014 11:10 AM, "Anne Gentle" <a...@openstack.org > >> <mailto:a...@openstack.org>> wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> Cross-posting to -docs and -operators. > >> > >> At the Ops mid-cycle meetup this week, Matt Griffin, David > >> Medberry, and Sriram Subramanian offered to start a review team > >> for the High Availability Guide. It needs some updates and it's > >> best if the review team works similar to the Security Guide -- > >> subject matter experts working with core docs team members for > >> reviews. So I'm proposing we pull it into its own repo just like > >> the Security Guide. Any reasons not to? I think the next steps > are: > >> > >> 1. Propose a patch to openstack/governance to show the repo is > >> governed by the Docs program. > >> 2. Propose a patch that sets up a separate review team starting > >> with Matt, David, and Sriram. We think Emilien would be > >> interested too, sound good? Any others? We can have members of > >> openstack-docs-core as well, similar to the Security Guide. > >> 3. Propose a patch that gets that guide building separately in a > >> different repo. > >> 4. Start working on the four bugs already logged [1] and logged > >> more as needed. > >> > >> > >> Hi all, > >> Sounds like we still need the tasks above to happen. > >> > >> Sriram and Andreas, I've got a branch with the HA Guide separated out > >> at https://github.com/annegentle/ha-guide -- can you take a look and > see > >> if we can use it for the starting point? If it's good-to-go, I can take > >> tasks 1 and 3. (Sriram, I hope you didn't get too far with the separate > >> repo, holler if you want to divvy up either of those.) > > > > That is as simple import without all the history and seems to have one > > level too much. > > > > I propose to do use git filter-branch to keep the history intact, > > Have a look at: > > https://github.com/ajaeger/ha-guide/tree/master/doc > > This one misses the top-level files that were in your directory but I > can add them back later on. > > Sriram, do you have the perfect solution? ;) > > Andreas > -- > Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi > SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany > GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg) > GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators