Hello,

In dnsmasq file in neutron will be ok. It will then force option 26 on vm.
You can also manually change it on vms to tests.

Slawek Kaplonski

W dniu 22.01.2015 o 17:06, Pedro Sousa pisze:
Hi Slawek,

I'll test this, did you change the mtu on dnsmasq file in /etc/neutron/?
Or do you need to change on other places too?

Thanks,
Pedro Sousa

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Sławek Kapłoński <sla...@kaplonski.pl
<mailto:sla...@kaplonski.pl>> wrote:

    I have similar and I also got something like 2-2,5Gbps between vms.
    When I
    change it to 8950 on vms (so in neutron conf) (50 less then on
    hosts) then it
    is much better.
    You can check that probably when You make test between vms on host
    there is
    process called "vhost-net" (or something like that) and it uses 100%
    of one cpu
    core and that is imho bottleneck

    Slawek Kaplonski

    On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 04:12:02PM +0000, Pedro Sousa wrote:
     > Hi Slawek,
     >
     > I have dhcp-option-force=26,1400 in neutron-dnsmasq.conf and
    MTU=9000 on
     > network-interfaces in the operating system.
     >
     > Do I need to change somewhere else?
     >
     > Thanks,
     > Pedro Sousa
     >
     > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Sławek Kapłoński
    <sla...@kaplonski.pl <mailto:sla...@kaplonski.pl>>
     > wrote:
     >
     > > Hello,
     > >
     > > Try to set bigger jumbo framse on hosts and vms. For example on
    hosts You
     > > can
     > > set 9000 and then 8950 and check then. It helps me with similar
    problem.
     > >
     > > Slawek Kaplonski
     > >
     > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 03:22:50PM +0000, Pedro Sousa wrote:
     > > > Hi all,
     > > >
     > > > is there a way to improve network performance on my instances
    with
     > > VXLAN? I
     > > > changed the MTU on physical interfaces to 1600, still
    performance it's
     > > > lower than in baremetal hosts:
     > > >
     > > > *On Instance:*
     > > >
     > > > [root@vms6-149a71e8-1f2a-4d6e-bba4-e70dfa42b289 ~]# iperf3 -s
     > > > -----------------------------------------------------------
     > > > Server listening on 5201
     > > > -----------------------------------------------------------
     > > > Accepted connection from 10.0.66.35, port 42900
     > > > [  5] local 10.0.66.38 port 5201 connected to 10.0.66.35 port
    42901
     > > > [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth
     > > > [  5]   0.00-1.00   sec   189 MBytes  1.59 Gbits/sec
     > > > [  5]   1.00-2.00   sec   245 MBytes  2.06 Gbits/sec
     > > > [  5]   2.00-3.00   sec   213 MBytes  1.78 Gbits/sec
     > > > [  5]   3.00-4.00   sec   227 MBytes  1.91 Gbits/sec
     > > > [  5]   4.00-5.00   sec   235 MBytes  1.97 Gbits/sec
     > > > [  5]   5.00-6.00   sec   235 MBytes  1.97 Gbits/sec
     > > > [  5]   6.00-7.00   sec   234 MBytes  1.96 Gbits/sec
     > > > [  5]   7.00-8.00   sec   235 MBytes  1.97 Gbits/sec
     > > > [  5]   8.00-9.00   sec   244 MBytes  2.05 Gbits/sec
     > > > [  5]   9.00-10.00  sec   234 MBytes  1.97 Gbits/sec
     > > > [  5]  10.00-10.04  sec  9.30 MBytes  1.97 Gbits/sec
     > > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
     > > > [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
     > > > [  5]   0.00-10.04  sec  2.25 GBytes  1.92 Gbits/sec   43
     > >  sender
     > > > [  5]   0.00-10.04  sec  2.25 GBytes  1.92 Gbits/sec
     > > >  receiver
     > > >
     > > >
     > > > *On baremetal:*
     > > > iperf3 -s
     > > > warning: this system does not seem to support IPv6 - trying IPv4
     > > > -----------------------------------------------------------
     > > > Server listening on 5201
     > > > -----------------------------------------------------------
     > > > Accepted connection from 172.16.21.4, port 51408
     > > > [  5] local 172.16.21.5 port 5201 connected to 172.16.21.4
    port 51409
     > > > [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth
     > > > [  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  1.02 GBytes  8.76 Gbits/sec
     > > > [  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  1.07 GBytes  9.23 Gbits/sec
     > > > [  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  1.08 GBytes  9.29 Gbits/sec
     > > > [  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  1.08 GBytes  9.27 Gbits/sec
     > > > [  5]   4.00-5.00   sec  1.08 GBytes  9.27 Gbits/sec
     > > > [  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  1.08 GBytes  9.28 Gbits/sec
     > > > [  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  1.08 GBytes  9.28 Gbits/sec
     > > > [  5]   7.00-8.00   sec  1.08 GBytes  9.29 Gbits/sec
     > > > [  5]   8.00-9.00   sec  1.08 GBytes  9.28 Gbits/sec
     > > > [  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  1.08 GBytes  9.29 Gbits/sec
     > > > [  5]  10.00-10.04  sec  42.8 MBytes  9.31 Gbits/sec
     > > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
     > > > [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
     > > > [  5]   0.00-10.04  sec  10.8 GBytes  9.23 Gbits/sec   95
     > >  sender
     > > > [  5]   0.00-10.04  sec  10.8 GBytes  9.22 Gbits/sec
     > > >  receiver
     > > >
     > > >
     > > > Thanks,
     > > > Pedro Sousa
     > >
     > > > _______________________________________________
     > > > OpenStack-operators mailing list
     > > > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
    <mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org>
     > > >
    http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
     > >
     > >



--
Pozdrawiam
Sławek Kapłonski
sla...@kaplonski.pl

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Reply via email to