the lack of lom is... difficult in this use case. more so than any of the other 3 defficiencies i listed.
I wonder if an after market lom board exists. On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Jesse Keating <j...@bluebox.net> wrote: > On 2/11/15 9:12 AM, Will Snow (wasnow) wrote: > >> I do miss LOM on the boxes tho – the dual interface would be nice, but I >> can work around that. >> I have a covey (pod? Gaggle?) of 4 NUCs with 1 being the master to >> deploy the others. That master has 2 nics (built in 1g, wifi) so you can >> very easily connect your cloud to your network. >> >> This allows my developers to test real multinode deploys of openstack >> repeatedly without the expense of 3 rack servers, and they can carry >> around the cloud to meetups or whereever they want to go. >> > > Unfortunately, part of our real multinode deployment scenarios include > utilizing LOM as part of the deployment. That would make these unsuitable > for such testing :/ > > -- > -jlk > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
