My thought is for each work session or general session, listen to the 
discussion to capture key information to write-up a use case. This includes 
asking clarifying questions along the way, During the wrap-up we'd want to 
establish priorities for the use cases and ask for a couple of Operator 
volunteers to review/assist in the development of the use case. If possible, 
during work sessions, we'd like to leave Vancouver with a strong draft of the 
use case.

>From there we'd put the use cases in the cross-project repo and use the 
>product work group process for socializing with the community and integrating 
>(as appropriate) on the roadmap.

I'm open to other thoughts and approaches, so pls offer your thoughts.
Thanks
Carol

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Fifield [mailto:t...@openstack.org] 
Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2015 6:29 PM
To: Barrett, Carol L; OpenStack Operators
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops @ Vancouver Summit - agenda brainstorming

A noble aim - I'd support this kind of activity from anyone who wants to do it 
:) Can you explain more about what you're thinking?


On 31/03/15 05:26, Barrett, Carol L wrote:
> Tom - In support of helping to create impact from the feedback, I suggest we 
> partner someone from the Product Work Group with each of the Moderators. The 
> role of the PWG partner would be to identify/summarize the top 1-2 use cases, 
> recruit a couple of operators to help flesh it out and then bring into the 
> roadmap discussion.
> 
> Thoughts?
> Carol
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Fifield [mailto:t...@openstack.org]
> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 10:04 PM
> To: OpenStack Operators
> Subject: [Openstack-operators] Ops @ Vancouver Summit - agenda 
> brainstorming
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> As you've no doubt guessed - the Ops Summit will return in Vancouver, and we 
> need your help to work out what should be on the agenda.
> 
> If you're new: note that this is in addition to the operations (and
> other) conference track's presentations. It's aimed at giving us a 
> design-summit-style place to congregate, swap best practices, ideas and give 
> feedback.
> 
> 
> We've listened to feedback from the past events, especially Paris, and 
> I'm delighted to report that from Vancouver on we're a fully 
> integrated part of the actual design summit. No more random other 
> hotels far away from things and dodgy signage put together at the last 
> minute - it's time to go Pro :)
> 
> 
> One biggest pieces of feedback we have regarding the organisation of these 
> events so far is that you want to see direct action happen as a result of our 
> discussions. We've had some success with this mid-cycle, for example:
> 
> * Rabbit - heartbeat patch merged [1], now listed as top 5 issue for 
> ops
> * OVS - recommendation for vswitch at least 2.1.2 [2]
> * Nova Feedback - large range of action items [3]
> * Security - raised priority on policy.json docs [4]
> 
> ... just a few amoungst dozens.
> 
> However, we can continue to improve, so please - when you are suggesting 
> sessions in the below etherpad please make sure you phrase them in a way that 
> will result in _actions_ and _results_.
> 
> 
> 
> **********************************************************************
> 
> Please propose session ideas on:
> 
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-ops-meetup
> 
> ensuring you read the new instructions to make sessions 'actionable'.
> 
> 
> **********************************************************************
> 
> 
> 
> The room allocation is still being worked out (all hail Thierry!), but the 
> current thinking is that the general sessions will all be on one day (likely 
> Tuesday), and the working groups will be distributed throughout the week.
> 
> 
> More as it comes, and as always, further information about ops meetups and 
> notes from the past can be found on the wiki @:
> 
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Operations/Meetups
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/146047/
> [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-OVS
> [3]
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-March/058801.h
> tml [4] https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bug/1311067
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operator
> s
> 


_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Reply via email to