On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Jonathan Proulx <j...@jonproulx.com> wrote:
> More tracks makes it harder for small to medium size sites to cover. > Not saying we shouldn't expand parallelism but we should be cautious. > > My site is a private university cloud with order of 100 hypervisors, > we're more or less happy to send 2 people to summits and one to mid > cycles, at least that's what I've gotten them to pay for in the past. > Obviously we don't come close to covering summits. The dual track > (for one attendee) in PHL was OK and conflicts weren't too bad. > > The obvious alternative if we need more sessions would be to go longer > and honestly I'm not keen on that either and would probably prefer > wider over longer. > +1 on wider vs longer. if we do go longer, let's limit it to half-day expansion (so folks can fly in or out that half day.) Of course if it is in Timbuktu, that 1/2 day won't buy much in terms of maximizing commute time. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timbuktu
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators