Heya. On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Mike Dorman <mdor...@godaddy.com> wrote: > Seems reasonable. > > For us already running v1, will we be creating another new cell database > for v2? Or will our existing v1 cell database become that second database > under v2?
Yes. Cells v2 will require a new database, you wont be able to reuse your existing cells database. > Somewhat beyond the scope of this thread, but my main concern is the > acrobatics going from v1 in Kilo to the hybrid v1/v2 in Liberty, to full > v2 in Mitaka. I think we all realize there will be some amount of pain to > get to v2, but as long as that case for us existing cells users can be > handled in a somewhat sane way, I’m happy. I'm actually not too concerned about that bit, but then again I'm not the primary developer on cells v2 so I might be confused. I don't think we've documented the intended transition from cells v1 to cells v2 in M, but perhaps Andrew Laski can chime in? Michael -- Rackspace Australia _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
