Not opposed to splitting like this. I know our other big agenda item is around cells, so maybe we could do a 1/3 split for each topic (still keeping Neutron first.)
Plus we’ve got the lunch time immediately before, so we could use that time for something. Matt VW, any thoughts? From: Ryan Moats Date: Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 2:35 PM To: Geoff Arnold Cc: "mord...@inaugust.com<mailto:mord...@inaugust.com>", OpenStack Operators Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for PAO Ops Meetup (August18, 19) The network discussion was going to be the first item for that breakout, so I think that might be possible (Mike, what say you?) Ryan Moats Geoff Arnold <ge...@geoffarnold.com<mailto:ge...@geoffarnold.com>> wrote on 08/06/2015 03:32:19 PM: > From: Geoff Arnold <ge...@geoffarnold.com<mailto:ge...@geoffarnold.com>> > To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS > Cc: mord...@inaugust.com<mailto:mord...@inaugust.com>, > openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>, > Tom Fifield <t...@openstack.org<mailto:t...@openstack.org>> > Date: 08/06/2015 03:31 PM > Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for PAO Ops Meetup > (August18, 19) > > I was afraid of that. > We’ve got 90 minutes for the breakout sessions - can we treat Large > Scale and Public as a single session, and divide it 45-45 or 60-30? > > Geoff > > On Aug 6, 2015, at 12:51 PM, Ryan Moats > <rmo...@us.ibm.com<mailto:rmo...@us.ibm.com>> wrote: > > Part of the LDT is discussing networking issues with Neutron folks > that will not be in the room, so moving it would require re- > synchronizing schedules. I'd rather avoid that if possible... > > Ryan Moats > > Geoff Arnold <ge...@geoffarnold.com<mailto:ge...@geoffarnold.com>> wrote on > 08/06/2015 12:37:49 PM: > > > From: Geoff Arnold <ge...@geoffarnold.com<mailto:ge...@geoffarnold.com>> > > To: Tom Fifield <t...@openstack.org<mailto:t...@openstack.org>>, > > mord...@inaugust.com<mailto:mord...@inaugust.com> > > Cc: > > openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org> > > Date: 08/06/2015 12:38 PM > > Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for PAO Ops Meetup > > (August 18, 19) > > > > Well, I’d prefer not to put Public Clouds into the existing HPC > > slot, because I’m involved in the Product WG discussion that’s > > scheduled at the same time. > > > > Could we put Public Clouds in the Tuesday breakout mix, and Large > > Deployments in the Wednesday breakout (replacing the HPC WG). > > > > Geoff > > > > PS Will you be there, Monty? Any preferences? > > > > > > > On Aug 5, 2015, at 7:31 PM, Tom Fifield > > > <t...@openstack.org<mailto:t...@openstack.org>> wrote: > > > > > > Thanks Geoff. > > > > > > Which session would you propose to replace? > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > Tom > > > > > > On 06/08/15 03:14, Geoff Arnold wrote: > > >> I’d like to see some time spent on specific issues associated with > > >> public cloud operations. (This is not the same as Large Deployments.) > > >> As Stefano pointed out yesterday: > > >> > > >> http://maffulli.net/2015/08/04/a-new-push-for-openstack-public-clouds/ > > >> > > >> this is an area which probably needs more attention. > > >> > > >> Cheers, > > >> > > >> Geoff
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
