Tom Fifield wrote: > A quick update from our tags team meeting in Palo Alto last month. > [...] > 1) Containerizable - new tag
Great idea, and having downstream assess that is certainly the best approach. > [...] > 3) "works in rally" - new tag suggestion > > There was general interest in asking the Rally team to consider making a > "works in rally" tag, since the rally tests were deemed 'good'. This one is part of a larger family of tags describing cross-project support (like "has an horizon plugin", or "has heat teamplates") that we started to work on on the upstream side as well. Those would be simple yes/no binary tags, and maintained by the related project team directly. Do you expect the "works in rally" answer to be more complex than a binary yes/no ? Do you think the tag should be maintained by operators rather than directly by the Rally project team ? If not, it's probably fine to get that one defined as other upstream-maintained tags in the same family. Cheers, -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
