Shamail, It's really quite hard thing to standardize because there are few dimensions: - Amount of resources (VMs, Volumes, Images, ... of service), - Amount of active users (how ofter resource are created/deleted), - Size of cloud (amount of nodes) - Cloud deployment architecture - ...
What I believe is that we should standardize: - Amount of resource per service per node - Typical sizes of cloud: 10, 20, 50, 100, ... nodes - Workloads that we should be run: For example In Rally team we are trying to standardize them here: https://github.com/openstack/rally/tree/master/certification/openstack - Deployment Reference Architecture - Somebody should find enough resources to run at least for each release those tests on real hardware And create depending on this few scale tags: works-on-X-scale Best regards, Boris Pavlovic On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Boris Pavlovic <bpavlo...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Shamail, > > It's really quite hard thing to standardize because there are few > dimensions: > - Amount of resources (VMs, Volumes, Images, ... of service), > - Amount of active users (how ofter resource are created/deleted), > - Size of cloud (amount of nodes) > - Cloud deployment architecture > - ... > > What I believe is that we should standardize: > > - Amount of resource per service per node > - Typical sizes of cloud: 10, 20, 50, 100, ... nodes > - Workloads that we should be run: > For example In Rally team we are trying to standardize them here: > https://github.com/openstack/rally/tree/master/certification/openstack > - Deployment Reference Architecture > - Somebody should find enough resources to run at least for each release > those tests on real hardware > > And create depending on this few scale tags: > works-on-X-scale > > > Best regards, > Boris Pavlovic > > On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Shamail <itzsham...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Large Deployments Team, >> >> The ops-tags team was brainstorming potential future tags at our last >> meeting and one topic of interest was to express the "scale" a service can >> operate at via tags. >> >> Scale, of course, can imply several different dimensions (not to mention >> test types). We figured who better to talk to about the definition of >> scale than the large deployment team. :-) >> >> Can you please help us understand how your team classifies a deployment >> as being large? I recall that, in the initial discussions, LDT was using >> the number of nodes. Is this still the case? Does large deployment factor >> in things such as throughout requirements, number of networks, number of >> volumes, etc. when deciding if a deployment is "large"? >> >> Thanks in advance for your help. If it makes more sense to discuss this >> topic at the next LDT meeting then I would be glad to join. >> >> Thank you, >> Shamail Tahir >> t: @ShamailXD >> tz: EST >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-operators mailing list >> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >> > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators