On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Erik McCormick <emccorm...@cirrusseven.com> wrote:
> > 2) More technically we'll need to address the challenge of local > > sound, how to we ensure all the mostly spontaious talk in a large work > > session makes it to remote participants. Passing a mic is a bit > > cumbersome and hard to enforce, while mic'ing the room to properly get > > ambient sound isn't likely something we can do without significant > > professional help. > > > > This is a technical issue that needs dealing with for sure. Passing a > mic is absolutely not practical, so it would need to be some sort of > ambient thing. We can't even get people to consistently go to a mic > during Q&A at the end of summit presentations. I've seen enough > teleconferencing systems that cover large boardroom settings to know > that such things exist, but I have no specific knowledge of what they > are, if they can be rented, or how much they cost. That will require a > lot of digging into. A key difference between the Ceph summit and the Ops Mid-cycle appears to be that the Ops Mid-cycle is at least an order of magnitude bigger. For a good amount of the Philly and Palo Alto mid-cycles there were 200ish people in a single room. Audio was a problem even for people sitting in the room at times. I think this is beyond “large boardroom” size.
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
