+1

________________________________
From: Melvin Hillsman
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 9:22:02 PM
To: Steven Dake (stdake); openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [kolla] question of default users for 
operators

Personally, if OpenStack default is to have a member or _member_ as an operator 
I would prefer there be a user according to the default.

Kind regards,
--
Melvin Hillsman
Ops Technical Lead
OpenStack Innovation Center

mrhills...@gmail.com
phone: (210) 312-1267
mobile: (210) 413-1659
Learner | Ideation | Belief | Responsibility | Command
http://osic.org


From: "Steven Dake (stdake)"
Date: Friday, July 29, 2016 at 10:35 PM
To: 
"openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>"
Subject: [Openstack-operators] [kolla] question of default users for operators

Hey folks,

In Kolla we have a significant bug in that Horizon can't be used because it 
requires a member user.  We have a few approaches to fixing this problem in 
mind, but want to understand what Operators want.  Devstack itself has switched 
between member and _member_ although Devstack isn't our reference: Operators 
are.

Which of those do operators prefer (if either).

Another question was whether we should create a default user named "user" and 
use this in place of member.

Thoughts welcome.

Regards
-steve
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing 
list 
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org>
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Reply via email to