Matt Riedemann wrote: > I just read through the blog post [1] about the upcoming Forum at the > summit. That might help things, at least that's the intent so I'd hope > it helps. We have had design summit sessions in the past where the nova > team asks for feedback from operators/users but those were generally not > well attended (we might get a handful of people). I had assumed the low > attendance was mostly due to scheduling conflicts and people just had > other places to be or more important sessions to attend, which is > understandable when you're trying to pack it all in at the summit. > > [1] http://superuser.openstack.org/articles/openstack-forum/
Yes, that is precisely the intent. Pike is arguably a bit transitional, since we won't have a "Forum" happening before the PTG, but that should be the last such cycle. In future cycles we'll be able to have those "what would you like to see in the next release" discussions at the Forum, in time for us to discuss them, turn them into priority blueprints and community goals, and solve last questions / start working on them at the PTG. So I'm very happy that Melvin started this "mini-Forum" thread to compensate while we transition to the new layout :) -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
