Hi Vahric! We tested GlusterFS a few years ago and the latency was high, poors IOPs and every node with a high cpu usage, well that was a few years ago.
We ended up after lot of tests using fio with Ceph cluster, so my advice it's use Ceph Cluster without doubts Regards, On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 1:32 PM Vahric Muhtaryan <vah...@doruk.net.tr> wrote: > Hello All , > > For a long time we are testing Ceph and today we also want to test > GlusterFS > > Interesting thing is maybe with single client we can not get IOPS what we > get from ceph cluster . (From ceph getting max 35 K IOPS for % 100 random > write and gluster gave us 15-17K ) > But interesting thing when add additional client to test its get same IOPS > with first client means overall performance is doubled , couldn’t test > more client but also interesting things is glusterfs do not use/eat CPU > like Ceph , a few percent of CPU is used. > > I would like to ask with Openstack , anybody use GlusterFS for instance > workload ? > Anybody used both of them in production and can compare ? Or share > experience ? > > Regards > Vahric Muhtaryan > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
