We have run ceph backed cinder from Liberty through Newton, with the exception of a libvirt 2.x bug that should now be fixed, cinder really hasn't caused us any problems.
Sent from my iPad > On May 31, 2017, at 6:12 PM, Joshua Harlow <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > So I was having some back and forth internally about is cinder ready for > usage and wanted to get other operators thoughts on how there cinder > experiences have been going, any trials and tribulations. > > For context, we are running on liberty (yes I know, working on getting that > to newer versions) and folks in godaddy are starting to use more and more > cinder (backed by ceph) and that got me thinking about asking the question > from operators (and devs) on what kind of readiness 'rating' (or whatever you > would want to call it) would people give cinder in liberty. > > Some things that I was thinking was around concurrency rates, because I know > that's be a common issue that the cinder developers have been working through > (using tooz, and various other lock mechanisms and such). > > Have other cinder operators seen concurrent operations (or conflicting > operations or ...) work better in newer releases (is there any metric/s > anyone has gathered about how things have gotten worse/better under scale for > cinder in various releases? partically with regard to using ceph). > > Thoughts? > > It'd be interesting to capture (not just for my own usage) I think because > such info helps the overall user and operator and dev community (and yes I > would expect various etherpads to have parts of this information, but it'd be > nice to have like a single place where other operators can specify how ready > they believe a project is for a given release and for a given configuration; > and ideally provide details/comments as to why they believe this). > > -Josh > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
